Red Valley Beach murder incident continued: A non-discriminatory murder suspect was sentenced to the death penalty

Recently, the news that the 5.94 Nanchang Honggutan murderer was sentenced to death has attracted wide attention. It is reported that on May 24 this year, the murder of the Red Valley Beach has been raging, what is going on in this? Let’s take a look at the details of this matter. The murderer of Honggutan was sentenced to death in 2019. Recently, the news that the murder of the murderer in Hongchangtan, Nanchang, 5.24, was widely concerned. It is reported that on May 24 this year, the murder of the Red Valley Beach has been raging, what is going on in this? Let’s take a look at the details of this matter. The murderer of Honggutan was sentenced to death on November 15, 2019. The Intermediate People’s Court of Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province publicly opened a court to pronounce Wan’s brother’s intentional homicide. He sentenced the defendant Wan Mou to death for deliberate homicide and deprived him of his political rights for life. Law = Hospital = After trial, the defendant platform test report “the mileage indicated in the test report is only a reference, no commitment to the true mileage” clause is a format clause, the effectiveness should be considered invalid, and the used car platform exists The fraudulent act shall compensate the plaintiff for the corresponding loss, and the judgment supported all the plaintiff’s claims. Although the judgment has clearly divided the defendant Mao Tingqiang to assume the liquidation obligation of 13,000 yuan, the validity of the judgment is only binding on the two defendants and does not affect the plaintiff. 2. The defendant Wu X and Yu Mengx paid the plaintiff China Minsheng Bank Co., Ltd. Nanchang Branch for the execution of the lawyer’s fee of 10,000 yuan to realize the creditor’s rights within 10 days after the judgment came into effect. The Red Valley Beach murder case began on May 24, 2019. In the Xihu District of Nanchang City, the defendant Wan Mou bought the knife and towel at the two sales outlets in Yuechi Road, and took a taxi at 17 o’clock on the same day. Go to the Wanda Plaza in Honggutan New District, Nanchang City to find the target. It was discovered that the victim Shen Mou and his companions were coming face to face. Wan Modi decided to kill Shen Mou who walked in the middle of the trio and followed the three. When the Hechang Group on the Fengzhong Road in the Red Valley Beach New District was at the gate of the construction site, Wan’s brother took a sharp knife from Shen’s body and then stabbed a few knives at his neck and neck, and killed Shenmou’s cockroaches. After going to Shen’s neck and neck, he even smashed a few knives. After that, he dropped the knife and fled to the underground garage of the Ruituo Capital Building. Shen Mou died after being rescued. After being examined by the forensic corpse, the victim Shen Mou was stabbed by others with a single-blade thorn to cause massive bleeding and death. At around 18:00 on the same day, Wan’s brother took the initiative to surrender in the underground police garage of the Nantuo Special Police Detachment in the underground garage of the Ruituo Capital Building. Appraised by the Jiangxi Psychiatric Judicial Appraisal Institute, Wan’s brother suffered from bipolar disorder, was in a state of remission at the time of the incident, and had complete identification and control capabilities, and was assessed as fully criminally responsible. The follow-up prosecutor of the Red Valley Beach murder case filed with the court that according to the criminal policy of “tempering justice with mercy” and the law of the People’s Republic of China, the defendant’s crime was extremely serious. The murderer of the Red Valley Beach was sentenced to death and refused to plead guilty. The defendant did not surrender, frankly, and reported the plot. If there is no statutory penalty, the punishment must be severely punished according to law. In addition, criminal suspects, defendants and convicted criminals who have been coerced, truthfully confessing that the crimes not yet in the jurisdiction of the judiciary are different from those already committed by the judiciary or determined by the judgment, are self-evident. Article 4 of the Supreme People’s Court’s Interpretation of Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in the Specific Application of Stolen and Ligongs stipulates that “criminals, defendants and criminals who have been sentenced to compulsory measures shall truthfully confess the crimes that the judicial organs have not yet mastered, The death of the Honggutan murderer who is the same crime as the crimes already in the jurisdiction or determined by the judiciary is punishable by discretion. According to the provisions of Article 22 of the Regulations on the Protection of Information Network Communication Rights, that is, the “safe haven principle”, all articles and contents of this website are uploaded by third-party authors. If there is any infringement, please contact this site in time to delete This site does not assume liability for content communication.